I've never really been interested in politics. In fact, this time last year, I probably would've had trouble describing the difference between a Democrat and a Republican. However, because I will be able to vote in the upcoming presidential election, I decided to take an interest so I can make my own informed decision. That's the main reason I watched Bush's speech on TV Sunday. Let me start out by saying that I really have no idea who I support for president. I guess I'm equally split between Bush and Kerry and don't really know enough about what each of them support or even what I believe to make a decision as of yet. With that in mind, I must say that I was not really impressed with Bush's speech. I know it was more of a friendly visit then a campaign visit, but still, with elections coming up in around four months, one would think that he would always have that in mind with every public speech he gave. I found it a little silly that he spent the first 10-15 minutes thanking the mayor, the city council, Shelley Moore-Capito (who my parents think is only in Congress because Bush supported her so much during her campaign), and pretty much everyone he could think of up to the boy and girl scout leaders and church officials, even all the people of West Virginia. Obviously, this roused plenty of cheers and excitement from the large crowd, all Bush supporters who probably would have cheered at anything he said that was the least bit praiseworthy or patriotic (and by patriotic, I mean all those things about "chasing the evil terrorists, who can't be reasoned with, out of their holes until every last one is gone" or something to that effect). Not to be overly critical, but there were some things he said that I found humorously ironic. For example, at one point he said something about how he was proud to be in the presence of someone who didn't try to change the constitution. I'm not sure who he was referring to, but I don't think I'm mistaking when I say that it was Bush who tried to change the constitution by adding an amendment banning gay marriage. Also, he said something about how there were so many more jobs in America. Funny, just a few minutes before his speech, the news people interviewed a woman who was concerned because she had just been laid off, along with about 270 people from her company. I'm sure she was hoping for more from the president than just a questionable statement that there were many more jobs available.
Basically, his speech had two parts. Part one: Thank you, thank you, thank you, West Virginia is great, blah, blah, blah, lots and lots of cheers and applause from the audience (who obviously would have cheered if he'd said something as simple as "Iraq and Afghanistan are bad"). Part two: Terrorists are bad, we're going to chase them down until they're all gone, we have to take the fight to them so they don't bring it to us, the people in Iraq are so much happier, they're living under a free government now (but aren't there still lots of soldiers in Iraq trying to keep the peace and even scaring some of the people? I'm not entirely sure I'd call that happy, living with soldiers and guns in your backyard), and the forefathers of America would be happy with the situation of America because we're trying to spread freedom and democracy to nations that were formerly trapped and oppressed by unjust rulers. Maybe I'm wrong to be skeptical, the audience seemed thrilled with these comments. I'm not entirely sure I buy all of that. I can honestly say that there was nothing impressive to me throughout the entire 25 minute speech. Well, I take that back, the number of secret service people that seemed to be following the president, wandering around everywhere was pretty impressive. Oops, it seems that my unbiased opinion has become sort of biased. Oh well, I read that John Kerry is coming on July 15. I'll try to hear what he has to say, then maybe I'll be just as critical of both. Then I'll have to vote for Ralph Nader. Just kidding.
Anyway, back to what I was saying before. I'm not entirely sure where I fit in in the whole conservative-liberal spectrum. I'm a registered Republican, but I didn't really think about it when I registered. I wasn't even planning on registering to vote at the time. I was at the DMV, getting my Learner's Permit for the 3rd or 4th time, when the guy working there asked me if I wanted to register to vote. So I said sure, and when he asked me if I wanted Republican or Democrat, I just said Republican. I hadn't really thought about it. My mom is a Democrat who is not afraid to verbally express her disdain toward Bush, while my dad is a Republican who rarely talks about politics. I think I was influenced the most by some very conservative friends who, in my opinion, have a low tolerance level for people who are the slightest bit liberal. I'm sort of hoping those people don't read this, or else I have a feeling I'll be in for some political lectures.
As far as my own beliefs go, I'm not really sure what I support. I find it difficult to say that one side is right and the other is wrong. I think that both sides have good and bad points to their arguments, and find it very difficult to say that I completely support one argument and think that the other is entirely wrong. That's why I'm horrible at arguments, I can't keep supporting my own argument because I end up finding something reasonable and agreeable in the other person's argument. Some examples on some issues that these friends feel strongly against: Abortion. Please don't disown me as a friend (if you read this, which I'm hoping you don't), but sometimes I think there are circumstances in which abortion may be the best option. Having an abortion just because you can may seem wrong, but I can definitely see instances in which it would not be a horrible thing. Rights for homosexuals: While I may not agree with the homosexual lifestyle, there always have been and always will be gay people in the world, it's not like they're suddenly going to convert to being straight. Anyway, throughout the course of my life, I have met some gay people who are very nice, and it would be sad to think that they should not have the same rights as everyone else. Who are we to condemn people and make them unequal to ourselves just because they choose to live their life differently? I'm sometimes afraid that thinking things like this is blasphemous to my religion, which is why I don't always know what to believe. As far as the war goes, I don't like the thought of always "chasing after the bad guys" like Bush says. I know that you have to stand up for yourself sometimes, but I really don't think it is America's responsibility to try to free the oppressed masses all over the world. I guess I really don't have a strong opinion on anything. I'm just walking a balance beam between two different views. Then again, I guess it's not really a big deal which political party you belong to, because in the big elections (yes, I know that's a very specific, professional term) you can vote for the candidate of whichever party you want. So I'll just keep my balance awhile longer.

4 Comments:
Hey Alison! Long entry lol. Good analysis tho. You should work for the news or something. Well about your entry, i think ur a very intellectual person and i believe that you do have the freedom of speech. i know u know that, but i think you should express ur beliefs and not excuse yourself because of the influence of others or fear of hurting someone. ppls can get upset about it if they want, but that's they're problem. i mean, it's always good to be conformative sometimes cuz there will always be other interesting pts of view. just don't be afraid to say whatcha want. well I HATE BUSH!!! and i'm not afraid to let my most staunch Republican friends know about it. they all know i'm a Democrat anyway lol. most ppls are kool with ur opinion and it's always a good thing to debate. in fact, i like a good debate sometimes. but anyway, i'm not tryin to sway u either way, Rep or Demo. just tellin ya what i think. :) no shame in it. l8r!
Your Cap bud,
REJ
July 10, 2004 at 1:32 AM
OK, just in case anyone out there is wondering who these two friends are that are mentioned several times throughout entries and comments.. you know, the two that are Bush supporters and make "threats" about not voting for him... it is Rachel and Jessica! There!! Out with it and enough with all the little code names. We have our own opinions that have just the same right to be spoken as anyone elses. We know what we support, what we stand up for and who we think is best for the job. So what if we don't conform to everyone else! We're getting pretty used to that anyways. I guess I should say I'm getting really used to that....
July 10, 2004 at 11:42 PM
Thanks a lot for blowing my cover anonymous person! Or should I say Charles? You know, I was trying to keep it a little vague. Ok, so it wasn't that vague and most everyone knew who I was talking about anyway, but still. Just don't even think about messing with our code names! Those go way back and are untouchable! ;)
July 11, 2004 at 9:54 AM
Well Alison I am finally posting a comment on your blog. I don't really want to register right now, but it is Rachel commenting. Just thought I would make that clear. LOL! So now it is not anonymous!! Anyway, now I have to respond to your political blog. This is just my opinion and it does not matter that our opinions differ. I just have to say something, though, when I don't agree with what something says. I always have an opinion, espacially when it comes to politics.
I have to disagree with you about Bush's speech, although it definately was not one of his best. It was just a celebration speech. I do not think that it would have been right for any political person to have made a campaign speech on that day. It was a non-partisan celebration for everyone. Your parents are right about Shelly Moore Capito, although I do not know how it is a bad thing. Also, President Bush is NOT the one who is trying to change the constitution. An ammendment to the constitution is not a change, but an addition. If there were not ammendments to the constitution we would still be allowed to have slaves and drinking would be illegal. The people on the other side of the issue are trying to change the constitution. They don't just want to add an ammendment to the constitution, but really change it. Also, there are more jobs in the country and the economy is doing well. The media is not going to show the good side of Bush alot of the time. That was just one company and 270 people. The media is very liberal and they would do anything to make Bush look bad.
About Iraq: I have a feeling they are more happy to have soldiers in their back yard than a crazy dicator. Now they don't have to worry about their leader gassing them or people they love (which by the way, Hussein did gas millions of his own people). They also can now decide who will be their leader and not a dictator. They know that the American soldiers will not hurt them and they are not permenant. I would trade Hussien and terroists for American soldiers any day. People in American have no idea how much the Iraqis lived through and we will probably never know. Also, they did bring the war to us on 9-11. We did not start this one, they did!
Well, if you post your comments online and tell people to read them you should be ready for a political lecture. I am just posting my opinions just like you did. Also, you really shouldn't let your friends form your opinions. They should not have that much of a hold on you. YOU are responsible to form your own opinions, and I am glad you are doing that now.
The arguement on abortion comes down to one thing: is there life at conception? Answer that question and you know what side you are on. I believe that life begins right at conception. There is a human life forming and it is murder to abort it. Most abortions don't happent until after the second or third month and check out these facts: at day 22 the babies heart beat begins and their OWN blood begins flowing through their body. By week five and six fingers, lips, brain, and feet start forming and become visible. That is way before abortions are even perfromed. Those two facts alone undeniably show me that it is a baby, not just a fetus. If it is a baby, it is murder.
About the homosexuals: there always will be homosexuals in the world, but that does not mkae it right. There will always be murderers in the world, but it is wrong to be one. Also, I believe that homosexuality is a psychological disease. Christian psychologists can treat and change homosexuals. God can take anyone and change them, even homosexuals, and that is His hope for every homosexuals. It is a sin. God and I still love them, but it is a sin just like any other one. We should not be prejudice to homosexuals, but we should understand that they are living in sin. Love the person and hate the sin.
Well I guess I will end this "political lecture" here. I don't care at all that you have different opinions than me, actually I am glad that you are forming your own opinions. Everyone needs to decide for themselves what they believe. But you can always count on me telling you my opinion and why I believe that way.
July 16, 2004 at 12:21 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home